ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that contrary to prevailing views (Higgins Merkel 1994) there is substantial evidence (Overton Louis & Sweeney 1997) which clearly corroborates previously well-understood though inadequately documented data points (Jones Jones & Smith 1958) correlating empirical methods of interpretation (Doug 1988) with more recent advances in statistical computation (Others, 2003). This analysis extends and clarifies significant metrics (Jan and Dean, 1963), which are shown to appreciably influence research outcomes (Yo Momma, 2004) when observed under normative investigative protocols (Kukla, Fran and Ollie, 1977). The paper further proposes a synthetic reinterpretation of classical models of inquiry (The Artist Formerly Known as Prince, 1985), which will be shown (Palin, 2012) to possess (Gary Indiana, Gary Indiana, Gary Indiana, 1947) consequential impacts (Read My Lips, 1982) for the determination (Cuisinart, 2001) of alternative potentialities (Poster Dude for the New Cool, 2001). Ultimately (Hairy Pits, 1989), the paper identifies (Wigged Out, 2008) salient examples (Yikes!, 1978) of qualitative (You Gotta Be Kidding, 1943) evidentiary procedures (Form 1040, 2006) which (Arlan Specter, 1983) contribute (My Space, 2009) to a more general (Patton, 1948) cognitive recognition (Go Figure, 1992) of (Yadda, Yadda, Yadda, 2006) (My Fingers Have Blisters on Them, 1977) relevant patterns of recurrent ( Beef with Water Chestnuts, 1968) phenomena (Ford Probe, 1993, Runs Good, Moving, Must Sell at Loss).